It has just been reported that the Minnesota couple claiming to give anyone a vote in whether their unborn child should experience birth or abortion is a hoax. Husband Pete Arnold admitted so to news sources this week. Apparently, he is pro-life, while his wife supports abortion.
But how could anyone think a website reducing a child's life to an online vote is really pro-life? True, it shows the irony of the weight of our vote in an election, but the concept was so disturbing and so insulting to their child. If they are really pregnant, I can't imagine telling "Baby Wiggles" someday that he was the center of an online controversy. Research has shown that the love children need must begin in the womb. Have the Arnolds treated their unborn child with the love and care he needs, or has their publicity stunt led to using him as a pawn in a worldwide debate?
Fortunately the nature of the site has been exposed.
No comments:
Post a Comment