Pages

Showing posts with label infertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infertility. Show all posts

Thursday, July 24, 2014

A great post for NFP Awareness Week

Update: The link now works!

What I should do is share my own post for NFP Awareness Week, but with the likelihood that I will not have time to pen my thoughts before the week is out, I want to share this post by Rita Buettner, which beautifully articulates why NFP is not birth control ... in fact, that it's not about being "in control" at all.
NFP says to God, "We recognize that we are not in control. We are going to do the best we can to make what we feel are the best decisions for our family, but we are also leaving this in Your hands. You are the giver of life, the One who knows better than we do what we can handle, what lies ahead, what plans you have for us."

NFP says, "Jesus, we place our trust in You. And we will be grateful for any gift you give, especially the gift of life."

God sent our children to us in a different way. And we endured years of infertility before we started down the road to adoption.

- See how God worked in the Buettners' lives here: http://www.catholicreview.org/blogs/open-window/2014/07/23/nfp-is-not-just-birth-control-how-infertility-deepened-my-appreciation-for-natural-family-planning#sthash.CiyEaStq.dpuf

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Quote book

"Every Christian marriage is blessed by God and is fruitful in him, whether through the blessing of children, or the blessing of sacrifice.  If God chooses the second alternative, the spiritual fruitfulness of marriage is increased and widened out invisibly so that it flows into the whole community." -- Adrienne von Speyr

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Gambling with time -- why wait until the last minute for children?

One of the most read articles on "The Atlantic" right now is entitled, "How Long Can You Wait to Have a Baby?" It's a puzzling question that seems to uncover from the beginning the mentality behind author Jean Twenge's gamble. If the ideal question really is, "How long can I wait to have a baby?" then having a baby is some sort of work project or trophy or item on the to-do list of life that needs to be checked off somewhere along the line.
Indeed, Twenge is adamant that modern women have been sold a bill of goods. Fertility in the late 30s really isn't as bad as people say, she writes. She said the statistics used are flawed, some even stemming from before life without electricity. 

And there are "dangers" with not waiting until the eleventh hour to have a baby, she warns
Literally: an analysis by one economist found that, on average, every year a woman postpones having children leads to a 10 percent increase in career earnings.

Yes, women of the 21st century, your goal is to wrangle your life in such a way that enables you to make as much money as possible, while still managing you to have a child before the biological clock sounds its final alarms. 
As I read Twenge's article about how late one can delay childbearing, I kept thinking of all of the unknowns that live in the future. It's not just about one's age. There are other surprises in life -- illnesses, devastating car accidents, the loss of one's spouse -- that can affect whether or not one is able to have children.  The longer one waits, the more these great unknowns continue to loom.  In other words, there are no guarantees.

Source
And if someone does have a reproductive illness, like endometriosis, it is far better to treat it early than to allow it to continue its work in the body.  Twenge suggests that women in their late 30s see a fertility specialist after six months of "trying," but wouldn't things like charting one's cycle, healing endometriosis or fibroids be far better to begin as soon as possible, rather than ask a doctor for IVF information or fertility drugs?

But the heart of the article is really the unsaid in the article.  Twenge's attitude and question presuppose an idea of children as object to be acquired, not as gift to be received.  To ask, "How long can I wait to have a child?" is almost like the high school or college student who asks, "How late can I wait to study for the test and still get a passing grade?"  Children aren't like that, though.

The fruitfulness of marriage is first a spiritual fruitfulness.  This can become visible through a child, but the couple is asked to be fruitful from the very first moment of their wedding vows.  The nature of authentic love is that it cannot help but give.  And give the couple must.  If their focus is the self and the stockpiling of money, accolades, career, material items, etc., then there's something wrong.  It's not that a couple cannot have these things, but if the focus of the marriage is on acquiring, even if it's together, this is vastly different from a marriage where the focus is on giving.

So, to ask the question of how late to delay childbearing is to misunderstand what marriage is, what generosity and fruitfulness are, and therefore what love truly is.  With a proper understanding of these, the right question to ask would be, "How soon can we have a child?" The attitude and lifestyle behind this question is vastly different from, "How can I have my cake, eat it too, and check off a child or two on my to-do list?"

I read several of the comments to the article, expecting to hear from some women who regretted having waited to try to have children.  Shockingly, most of the comments I saw were arguing that this question shouldn't be asked because not all women want to have children.  To even further the underlying attitude of the article, these commentors were expressing the idea that children are extrinsic to marriage and are only good insofar as you choose to have them.  If a woman wants to be a careerist, then no one should be telling her that she might later regret having children.  So they argue.

And it all points to the unhappy contraceptive mentality of our culture, which has not only changed our idea of love and marriage, but of children themselves.  

Thursday, April 11, 2013

From the "You can't make this stuff up" file ...

We have two stories.

1) In California, legislation is being considered that would require insurance companies to cover the "infertility" of same-sex couples.  If they have not conceived after a year of sexual relations, they would qualify.  ...I'm pretty sure the year wouldn't be a necessary qualification in this case.

2) An Israeli company is experimenting with powdered eggs ... women's eggs.  After all, freezing eggs becomes a bit of a chore with the space and expense, so why not freeze dry them?  Add water and sperm to "make a baby."  

We really are living in the land of the spoiled child.  If I want something, even if it is naturally impossible, then someone somewhere somehow has to figure out how to give it to me.  Now.  

Friday, July 29, 2011

UP & The Gift of Infertility

This is a fantastic and thoughtful read about the topic of infertility through the lens of the Pixar film, "Up" -- UP & The Gift of Infertility. It's definitely worth reading, pondering, and perhaps even watching the film again with these points in mind.